We are free individuals.

The foundations of constitutions in many parts of the world stems from English Common Law, while Roman law bears significant influence in legal systems.

The 'Charter of Liberties' of Henry I, 1100, paved the way for the rule of law and constitutionalism. It also set the stage for the Magna Carta, in 1215. The Charter of Liberties bound the King to the laws and was delivered on Henry I's corronation. It was not presented as a considered document of good governance, but rather as a response to the oppression and tyrany of his predecessor, his brother, William Rufus, (William II).

“Know that by the mercy of God and the common counsel of the barons of the whole kingdom of England I have been crowned king of said kingdom; and because the kingdom had been oppressed by unjust exactions, I, through fear of god and the love which I have toward you all,… “

The Charter was not legislation, but rather a promise to return to the law. Henry I didn't exactly abide by his own charter, but it was the statement that defined the extent of the monarchs power that was called upon and led to the form of the Magna Carta (1215).

The Magna Carta, is an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people set down in it and to look after the peoples best interests, in return for the crowns promise to the people they agreed to be ruled by the crown, so it was a contract between crown and people, and it became the law.
The crown had to uphold the rights and common law as did the people, not to cause death, harm, or loss to another, or be fraudulent in your contracts (in other words be honest and true).

In 1689 the bill of rights was set down on paper, this basically sealed all the rights given in the Magna Carta plus a few more, both documents contain our UK common law written down and formed our law while also being the foundation of constitutional law around the globe.

"The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689…Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not…."

Lord Justice Laws on 18th February 2002

The statement by Lord justice Laws (above) affirms that it is our constitution and cannot just be scrapped by parliament. it is still valid law no mater what our politicians say, they have never had the right to repeal any of it.

The Magna Carta serves Common Law and protects against corruption of monarch or parliament. Article 61 of the Magna Carta was written such that if this happened any person could petition the crown to address the issue (or parliaments), the crown has 40 days to resolve the issue or dissolve parliament. If, after 40 days nothing was resolved the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament lawfully until the problem was resolved.

Because this is lawful and the petitioner has a right to do it he would go into “lawful rebellion”, he would no longer have allegiance to the crown or parliament because they had become corrupt etc,  it is law that this can be done, and is actually obeying the law, because it is the peoples duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.

There is a difference between 'lawful' and 'legal'. Anything in our constitution including common law is lawful (true law). Any acts that parliament have passed are legal, these will be in the form of acts or statute laws, these “legal” acts should not contradict common law or what’s in our constitution. In view of this,  if parliament wanted to pass new legal acts etc it had to find a way of doing it and making it enforceable. Admiralty law provided the model for this.

Admiralty law requires the swearing of an oath to obey. It became a legal contract and so it was enforceable. We are compelled to live under Admiralty Law or the law of the sea without even realising it and without realising that all commerce is based in the concept of bilateral contract. A statute law, or act, in legal terms is defined as “an act given the force of law by the consent of the governed”, note it says consent, so if you don’t consent to it and there is no contract between yourself and the other party it is not law.

A register of birth certificate represents a contract your parents made on your behalf. An individual is not bound by this contract as they were not consenting of their own free will. The legal system adopts many strategies to gain consent, and most people are unaware of these methods. Admiralty law, now essentially forms the basis of commercial law under the principle of contract. Your birth certificate contracts you as commodity of the state. This is not so if you do not consent to this contract.

This article only gives an overview of this relationship with legal authority and law. Before acting on this information, ensure that you are fully aware of all the implications. There are many resources available on-line to research and understand your position in legal and lawful terms. Below are a few useful links.

The Peoples United Community

Freeman on the Land

Freedom Rebels Network